Baldur's Gate Wiki


To avoid conflixion, I suggest standards for grammar and spelling should be set: for consistency's sake. Ie, ise/ize, our/or, re/er, periods or commas for number grouping, &c. EtaNett--"You think you are special, and the rules don't apply to you. You are sadly mistaken." 02:45, January 6, 2013 (UTC)


You should rename the main page to Baldur's Gate Wiki. Proper spelling.--Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 18:04, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Huh.  I never even noticed that.  Good spotting - I just fixed it. - Erik the Mad (talk) 16:57, November 17, 2015 (UTC)

Game Mechanics[]

There are two separate pages for Game mechanics/Game Mechanics.  I would suggest merging them to one standard. WaterRabbit (talk) 02:34, April 22, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, but for future reference, please mention things like this on my talk page.  Otherwise, it can be easy to miss.  I have fixed it, however. - Erik the Mad (talk) 15:35, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Games section[]

The "Games" section could use some rearrangement. There also appears to be a pointless bullet underneath BG2:EE? Buttercheese (talk) 07:55, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

"Other Dungeons and Dragons gaming wikis"[]

I noticed the NWN2 wiki is missing from the list, I am not sure how it can be included, but I feel it deffinetly belongs there Buttercheese (talk) 09:15, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Done. And in less than a year! ;) -- UserCCCSig -- You talkin' to me? -- cCContributions -- 22:08, December 29, 2017 (UTC)

Dark-theme fix[]


In fixing the welcome page for dark theme, I changed the background of the first table block thing so that it would take the wiki's "official" secondary background, as derived automatically from the primary background set with Special:ThemeDesigner. To me it looks good in dark theme, but this is a noticeable change for light theme compared to what we have now. Can you check out and tell me if you'd rather have a background that's more clearly distinct from the "primary" background color? If so, should it be the same we have currently for the other, not-yet fixed table block things, or something else?

This is the second most visited page, so more than one opinion wouldn't hurt I think. This talk page is open to anyone and not just accounts with ridiculously exclusive rights. ^_^'

Haximus Thunderburp (talk), 30 April 2023

Dark Alliance[]

It just occurred to me to wonder, why don't we support Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance and Dark Alliance 2? They're at least partially by Black Isle, and nominally in the same world, and while the rules are 3rd Ed, we support BG3 which is 5th. (note I am not volunteering, I don't own either) -Caraamon (talk) 15:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

We are supporting them theoretically, but not practically. From what I understand, most editors are like yourself on this: they want the wiki to include such info, but are not volunteering to contribue :D -- Hazif (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)