Board Thread:Suggestions on Baldur's Gate Wiki/@comment-3045005-20191211220131/@comment-3234315-20191211235756

Only some shorts:
 * Yes, any red link appears on that list. (That's why I'm sometimes editing other people's comments – to get rid of them.) If you really need something like that, use the complete web address in single brackets, with a space and the desired text to display behind the address and still inside the brackets. Makes it an internal, "green" link, and it's not on the list.
 * Everything that may have a list. "North to" etc. shouldn't have one – each area has at max one connected into each direction (except for possible differences between editions).
 * "Non-list format": I meant, if we decide to have certain fields without a bullet point list, but still with (possibly) multiple entries.
 * That notation at the Undercity was, IIRC, done by me not so long ago. And someone else just recently added much of these coordinates to many (all?) companion pages, due to consistency. (That was when I started thinking about over-coordinating …)
 * Oh, that you meant … just from the looks, I'd prefer the parentheses version – which brings us back to when to use "small", italics or both …
 * 300×185 = golden ratio. 300px, because that's the max width presented in an infobox if we switch to a certain styling of the wiki. Currently, that's 270px.
 * The semicolon thing and the reasons for it are mentioned on the Template:Infobox item/doc.
 * Take a look at the Baldur's Gate Wiki:Model Pages if you want what comes next to a styling guide here, though I don't agree with many entries on them as being "model" pages …