Talk:Canon/@comment-44643388-20191211095805/@comment-3045005-20191211130737

I rewrote this page over two weeks ago. Initially it was full of speculative theorizing and hardline assumptions that "this party is canon." Now it is not. Have you actually read the page? It goes to great lengths to state at every single turn that no game establishes any party or main character as canon.

"Therefore it cannot be stated definitively that Baldur's Gate II establishes a canon party for the first game"

"More than any other game, Siege goes out of its way to deny any particular canon party"

"Baldur's Gate II does not enforce any particular party, and there are not yet any game sources set post-BGII that make any declaration one way or the other"

"The game is flexible in allowing the player to make their own determinations on this front"

etc.

Essentially, each section that made a declarative stance on canon I changed directly to a refutation of that, except where some facts are established by the game, like Jaheira claiming that she traveled with Gorion's Ward and left the world in a better state for it, or that Gorion's Ward is 20 years old.