Talk:Elf/@comment-3234315-20180122160231/@comment-3234315-20180614103754

Hi.

My comment was a reaction to an edit on that day, that had this as summary: "Removed thief from recommended classes, halflings are better. Removed fighter/thief from the list for the same reason."

The thieves are back now, so my main concern is satisfied.

Or …

No, actually my main concern is that I hold this whole recommendation thing in the form it is currently handled on most pages for very subjective. With bad or completely missing explanations. With vague wording or personal opinions.

One contributor removed thief from the recommendation, another one added it back. See? Personal points of view. That's not wiki-style, that mustn't happen. So how can this be avoided? By explaining things in detail. By listing arguments and counterarguments. Possibly a pro-contra-table …

Did you understand why I changed some of your edits on Fighter and Sorcerer (I tried to explain in my edit summary)?