Board Thread:Suggestions on Baldur's Gate Wiki/@comment-3234315-20190120164221/@comment-3234315-20190120213547

Wow! I wasn't aware that on that specific infobox "documentation" so many already implemented parameters were missing in the copy-paste "full infobox" section …

Okay, I've re-ordered parameters. "Spell level" and "max caster level" are now on one row – might look odd when the latter isn't filled, but surely looks better when both are used. The parameters you requested ( &  ) use the same layout, right below. "(Not) usable by" just beneath "spellbook", then "school" and "sphere".

No "how to fill" section, yet (and I'm still not sure about certain parameters), but at least the copy-paste section is complete. Take a look.

Priest spell scroll auto-categorization just checks if WHAAT??? is filled with anything (except a comment) and then adds to the cat. if  is "priest" (not case-sensitive) … uhm … now that you're pointing me to this … wait, just one fix …

Priest spell scroll auto-categorization just checks if  is filled with anything (except a comment) and then adds to the cat. if  is "priest" (not case-sensitive)

What I'm doing currently, is looking for all spells that still need a disambiguation suffix – and editing them in the process. This is, however, not the same as you are doing: I usually don't check the correctness of facts, I only fix/add links and try to give them a leveled layout and wording. So, still work to do then.

(Though this is only that complex with all those "Protection From …" spells – where a protection scroll exists for everybody and a spell (and sometimes two). And with the original editions using a lowercase "from" for the item names, but an uppercase for the spell names. Lots of redirects …)

To have "Scroll: Spell Name" (or similar) was a request by another user. I think, it's more obvious when the link's named as this instead of "Spell name ((spell) scroll)" – though with my current solution I still have to find something for the priest spell scrolls, a category … Later!

One question: we had talked about "spread_specs", and I said if you don't have the info, leave it empty. Have you learned something about it in the meanwhile? Because you emptied the present value on your edit here. Was it wrong?

Looking forward to this "good reference"! :)