Talk:Canon/@comment-174.221.12.112-20191123030012/@comment-3045005-20191123192000

Some of the edits had their heart in the right place, but snark is not appropriate for a wiki.

I agree that more precise, detailed commentary is needed to highlight the speculative nature of this, and the article could use many [citation needed] tags. I might start working toward some of the changes that I feel could improve it.