Board Thread:Suggestions on Baldur's Gate Wiki/@comment-3234315-20171222065620/@comment-3234315-20171223081203

You like it? :D

Honestly? Didn't expect this …

It's a real raw, unrefined formatting. Surely there's a better way to place them than using these tables (plural necessary for floating beside the infobox – one table didn't work easily).

As the filenames suggest: GUIBTACT.bam

The X would be GUIBTACT00058.png

BGII uses icons with complete background, so definitely a square. That's why I went for the old ones. I guess, that's similar with EE. Look for yourself …

Yeah, did remind me, too … Will see if I find time these days. Surely not until Wednesday, 'cause I'm with no access to my PC over the Christmas days.

"As for the content reorganization": sometimes things will change, despite being "established years ago." If something new would be better than the old established structure, or if a majority of people want a change, then a change will happen. And don't care about consistency then: changes apply over time – there would be absolutely no need to move through all wiki articles at once to restructure section order. That's a process, if such changes become part of some sort of guideline.

And in my eyes it's no real change, more a restructuring of the existent but oftentimes extensive intro sections into something more brief and an extra "background" or whatever you might call it section.

Ah, back to this topic later, perhaps in '18 …

For now: a happy and merry Christmas time to you all! Peace and harmony!