Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4986265-20141023083718/@comment-1883569-20141024215223

Hello,

You made a rather large post with some large paragraphs, so I will probably forget to adress some points. It seems that you already have solved some problems between the post and me writing a response. But your main point is right, the quest pages and categorisation are in dire need of improvement. It's hard to solve a problem without feedback from someone else, I know this from experience here. And it's better to discuss important subjects here than a talk page.

About the pages with names which are different in BG:EE, you can give their BG:EE name, because in the classic Baldur's Gate, there were only journal post and the writer of the page had to think of a name straightforward. If you are worried about some things breaking, rename the page and don't select leave a redirection. Then you can find internal links to the quest page with Special:Whatlinkshere, and rename them one by one, unless there too many links.

If you encounter pages with information about a npc and a quest related or non-related, you can make a new page. The list of quests for Baldur's Gate is far from complete and you should add as many quests you know about it to the list.

About the the categorisation for quests, I think it's a good idea if we create a new category for unmarked quests. The category side quest is indeed for all quests which aren't required to be finished in the games unlike the category main quests, but there any or many main quests pages so far. I think we need more discussion about quests and criteria for quests.

Mark those pages which contain only a single sentence. About the winter wolf pelts, I shall make a disambiguation page which redirects to the item and the quest.

Thanks for your work on the quests section!