Board Thread:Improvements and Suggestions/@comment-978785-20170829132627/@comment-978785-20170830023125

Islandking wrote: No, as the ogre is carring two notable girdles, I think it's better to name it to Ogre (Unshey's Belt quest), or with other quest names, thankfully he's only involved in one quest, not two :-) Related quest is called A Rogue Ogre as per EE journal entry, so it could be named "Ogre (A Rogue Ogre)" by the quest name, instead of the unique item he carries. However, with that in mind, to keep uniform names, it would be preferred to change Hobgoblin (Boots of Stealth) to "Hobgoblin (Zhurlong's Missing Boots)" – in classic BG there were two ogres carrying the boots, which probably promped to call it Hobgoblin Thief and treat is as a type such as Hobgoblin (archer), but I think it was actually omission and not a planned type, as the boots were supposed to be unique and EE fixed it. Luckily, Hobgoblin (Joia's Flamedance Ring) is the same nevertheless ;) That's all fine with me, however, there's also the Nobleman (Golden Pantaloons) – that's a bit tricky, as the quest is unmarked, but it's referred in wiki as Golden Pantaloon Decision, so that would require to change his name to "Nobleman (Golden Pantaloon Decision)", unless we want to make exception for unmarked quests (actually, I think there's a typo, as the quest should be called "Golden Pantaloons Decision''', plural, as item name, so may want to change that).

So, to sum up – if we'de be to call the creatures by quest names instead of items, it's all fine, though keep in mind there's unmarked quests.

Either way, it's really late now, so I have to take a nap at least – feel free to reply and I'll take a look tomorrow :).