Talk:Generic Buildings (Baldur's Gate)/@comment-43741529-20191201211052/@comment-3045005-20191203124754

Maybe most of this should be moved to a discussion forum thread since it's gotten more about style and editors and less relevant to this page specifically.

Alright, links in the headers are no problem to remove, I just did that because I was used to the first mention of a thing to be linked. I guess it is only an issue on a page done like this where you want to link back to the main map location and haven't had cause to mention it in text yet.

In my opinion it should be ok to use abbreviations if they are going to be used throughout a long page and the abbreviation is properly explained at the top, as I've done here. DC is a very common abbreviation in paper and pencil role-playing games, this is just one example. I believe the term originated in 3rd edition, but shouldn't be out of place to use in this context.

I actually tried to link to these headings without the URL-style links, which is what I prefer, but it didn't work for me for some reason. I guess that's a reason not to use parenthesis and slashes in headings. We'll see whether it works any differently here:

Generic Buildings (Baldur's Gate)

Generic Buildings (Baldur's Gate)

Do you think the links to them should be done with span like that, directly to an AR address? I really don't know of a better way to differentiate them. There are places on this wiki where the parenthetical AR codes are done in superscript which I think looks better, I just hadn't copied that here since I didn't know how that would interact with a heading.